Tuesday, January 19, 2010

For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.

It's been a while since I have posted on here... been busy working on my new book and school. But this morning I want to remember one of the greatest speeches ever given.

--------------------------------------

Well, things worked out a little different from the way I thought, but let me tell you, I still love New York.

My fellow Democrats and my fellow Americans, I have come here tonight not to argue as a candidate but to affirm a cause. I'm asking you--I am asking you to renew the commitment of the Democratic Party to economic justice.

I am asking you to renew our commitment to a fair and lasting prosperity that can put America back to work.

This is the cause that brought me into the campaign and that sustained me for nine months across 100,000 miles in 40 different states. We had our losses, but the pain of our defeats is far, far less than the pain of the people that I have met.

We have learned that it is important to take issues seriously, but never to take ourselves too seriously.

The serious issue before us tonight is the cause for which the Democratic Party has stood in its finest hours, the cause that keeps our Party young and makes it, in the second century of its age, the largest political party in this republic and the longest lasting political party on this planet.

Our cause has been, since the days of Thomas Jefferson, the cause of the common man and the common woman.

Our commitment has been, since the days of Andrew Jackson, to all those he called "the humble members of society--the farmers, mechanics, and laborers." On this foundation we have defined our values, refined our policies and refreshed our faith.

Now I take the unusual step of carrying the cause and the commitment of my campaign personally to our national convention. I speak out of a deep sense of urgency about the anguish and anxiety I have seen across America.

I speak out of a deep belief in the ideals of the Democratic Party, and in the potential of that Party and of a President to make a difference. And I speak out of a deep trust in our capacity to proceed with boldness and a common vision that will feel and heal the suffering of our time and the divisions of our Party.

The economic plank of this platform on its face concerns only material things, but it is also a moral issue that I raise tonight. It has taken many forms over many years. In this campaign and in this country that we seek to lead, the challenge in 1980 is to give our voice and our vote for these fundamental democratic principles.

Let us pledge that we will never misuse unemployment, high interest rates, and human misery as false weapons against inflation.

Let us pledge that employment will be the first priority of our economic policy.

Let us pledge that there will be security for all those who are now at work, and let us pledge that there will be jobs for all who are out of work; and we will not compromise on the issue of jobs.

These are not simplistic pledges. Simply put, they are the heart of our tradition, and they have been the soul of our Party across the generations. It is the glory and the greatness of our tradition to speak for those who have no voice, to remember those who are forgotten, to respond to the frustrations and fulfill the aspirations of all Americans seeking a better life in a better land.

We dare not forsake that tradition. We cannot let the great purposes of the Democratic Party become the bygone passages of history.

We must not permit the Republicans to seize and run on the slogans of prosperity. We heard the orators at their convention all trying to talk like Democrats. They proved that even Republican nominees can quote Franklin Roosevelt to their own purpose.

The Grand Old Party thinks it has found a great new trick, but 40 years ago an earlier generation of Republicans attempted the same trick. And Franklin Roosevelt himself replied, "Most Republican leaders have bitterly fought and blocked the forward surge of average men and women in their pursuit of happiness. Let us not be deluded that overnight those leaders have suddenly become the friends of average men and women."

"You know," he continued, "very few of us are that gullible." And four years later when the Republicans tried that trick again, Franklin Roosevelt asked "Can the Old Guard pass itself off as the New Deal? I think not. We have all seen many marvelous stunts in the circus, but no performing elephant could turn a handspring without falling flat on its back."

The 1980 Republican convention was awash with crocodile tears for our economic distress, but it is by their long record and not their recent words that you shall know them.

The same Republicans who are talking about the crisis of unemployment have nominated a man who once said, and I quote, "Unemployment insurance is a prepaid vacation plan for freeloaders." And that nominee is no friend of labor.

The same Republicans who are talking about the problems of the inner cities have nominated a man who said, and I quote, "I have included in my morning and evening prayers every day the prayer that the Federal Government not bail out New York." And that nominee is no friend of this city and our great urban centers across this Nation.

The same Republicans who are talking about security for the elderly have nominated a man who said just four years ago that "Participation in social security should be made voluntary." And that nominee is no friend of the senior citizens of this Nation.

The same Republicans who are talking about preserving the environment have nominated a man who last year made the preposterous statement, and I quote, "Eighty percent of our air pollution comes from plants and trees."

And that nominee is no friend of the environment.

And the same Republicans who are invoking Franklin Roosevelt have nominated a man who said in 1976, and these are his exact words, "Fascism was really the basis of the New Deal." And that nominee whose name is Ronald Reagan has no right to quote Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

The great adventures which our opponents offer is a voyage into the past. Progress is our heritage, not theirs. What is right for us as Democrats is also the right way for Democrats to win.

The commitment I seek is not to outworn views but to old values that will never wear out. Programs may sometimes become obsolete, but the ideal of fairness always endures.

Circumstances may change, but the work of compassion must continue. It is surely correct that we cannot solve problems by throwing money at them, but it is also correct that we dare not throw out our national problems onto a scrap heap of inattention and indifference. The poor may be out of political fashion, but they are not without human needs. The middle class may be angry, but they have not lost the dream that all Americans can advance together.

The demand of our people in 1980 is not for smaller government or bigger government but for better government. Some say that government is always bad and that spending for basic social programs is the root of our economic evils. But we reply: The present inflation and recession cost our economy $200 billion a year. We reply: Inflation and unemployment are the biggest spenders of all.

The task of leadership in 1980 is not to parade scapegoats or to seek refuge in reaction, but to match our power to the possibilities of progress. While others talked of free enterprise, it was the Democratic Party that acted and we ended excessive regulation in the airline and trucking industry and we restored competition to the marketplace. And I take some satisfaction that this deregulation was legislation that I sponsored and passed in the Congress of the United States.

As Democrats we recognize that each generation of Americans has a rendezvous with a different reality. The answers of one generation become the questions of the next generation. But there is a guiding star in the American firmament. It is as old as the revolutionary belief that all people are created equal, and as clear as the contemporary condition of Liberty City and the South Bronx.

Again and again Democratic leaders have followed that star and they have given new meaning to the old values of liberty and justice for all.

We are the party. We are the party of the New Freedom, the New Deal and the New Frontier. We have always been the party of hope. So this year let us offer new hope, new hope to an America uncertain about the present, but unsurpassed in its potential for the future.

To all those who are idle in the cities and industries of America let us provide new hope for the dignity of useful work. Democrats have always believed that a basic civil right of all Americans is their right to earn their own way. The party of the people must always be the party of full employment. To all those who doubt the future of our economy, let us provide new hope for the reindustrialization of America. And let our vision reach beyond the next election or the next year to a new generation of prosperity. If we could rebuild Germany and Japan after World War II, then surely we can reindustrialize our own nation and revive our inner cities in the 1980s.

To all those who work hard for a living wage let us provide new hope that the price of their employment shall not be an unsafe workplace and a death at an earlier age.

To all those who inhabit our land from California to the New York Island, from the Redwood Forest to the Gulfstream waters, let us provide new hope that prosperity shall not be purchased by poisoning the air, the rivers and the natural resources that are the greatest gift of this continent.

We must insist that our children and our grandchildren shall inherit a land which they can truly call America the beautiful.

To all those who see the worth of their work and their savings taken by inflation, let us offer new hope for a stable economy. We must meet the pressures of the present by invoking the full power of government to master increasing prices.

In candor, we must say that the Federal budget can be balanced only by policies that bring us to a balanced prosperity of full employment and price restraint.

And to all those overburdened by an unfair tax structure, let us provide new hope for real tax reform. Instead of shutting down classrooms, let us shut off tax shelters.

Instead of cutting out school lunches, let us cut off tax subsidies for expensive business lunches that are nothing more than food stamps for the rich.

The tax cut of our Republican opponents takes the name of tax reform in vain. It is a wonderfully Republican idea that would redistribute income in the wrong direction. It is good news for any of you with incomes over $200,000 a year. For the few of you, it offers a pot of gold worth $14,000. But the Republican tax cut is bad news for the middle income families.

For the many of you, they plan a pittance of $200 a year, and that is not what the Democratic Party means when we say tax reform.

The vast majority of Americans cannot afford this panacea from a Republican nominee who has denounced the progressive income tax as the invention of Karl Marx. I am afraid he has confused Karl Marx with Theodore Roosevelt--that obscure Republican president who sought and fought for a tax system based on ability to pay. Theodore Roosevelt was not Karl Marx, and the Republican tax scheme is not tax reform.

Finally, we cannot have a fair prosperity in isolation from a fair society. So I will continue to stand for a national health insurance.

We must not surrender to the relentless medical inflation that can bankrupt almost anyone and that may soon break the budgets of government at every level. Let us insist on real control over what doctors and hospitals can charge, and let us resolve that the state of a family's health shall never depend on the size of a family's wealth.

The President, the Vice President, the members of Congress have a medical plan that meets their needs in full, and whenever senators and representatives catch a little cold, the Capitol physician will see them immediately, treat them promptly, fill a prescription on the spot. We do not get a bill even if we ask for it, and when do you think was the last time a member of Congress asked for a bill from the Federal Government?

I say again, as I have before, if health insurance is good enough for the President, the Vice President and the Congress of the United States, then it is good enough for you and every family in America.

There were some who said we should be silent about our differences on issues during this convention, but the heritage of the Democratic Party has been a history of democracy. We fight hard because we care deeply about our principles and purposes. We did not flee this struggle. We welcome the contrast with the empty and expedient spectacle last month in Detroit where no nomination was contested, no question was debated, and no one dared to raise any doubt or dissent.

Democrats can be proud that we chose a different course and a different platform. We can be proud that our party stands for investment in safe energy instead of a nuclear future that may threaten the future itself.

We must not permit the neighborhoods of America to be permanently shadowed by the fear of another Three Mile Island.

We can be proud that our party stands for a fair housing law to unlock the doors of discrimination once and for all. The American house will be divided against itself so long as there is prejudice against any American buying or renting a home.

And we can be proud that our party stands plainly and publicly and persistently for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.

Women hold their rightful place at our convention, and women must have their rightful place in the Constitution of the United States. On this issue we will not yield, we will not equivocate, we will not rationalize, explain or excuse. We will stand for E.R.A. and for the recognition at long last that our nation was made up of founding mothers as well as founding fathers.

A fair prosperity and a just society are within our vision and our grasp, and we do not have every answer. There are questions not yet asked, waiting for us in the recesses of the future, but of this much we can be certain because it is the lesson of all our history: Together a president and the people can make a difference. I have found that faith still alive wherever I have traveled across this land. So let us reject the counsel of retreat and the call to reaction. Let us go forward in the knowledge that history only helps those who help themselves.

There will be setbacks and sacrifices in the years ahead but I am convinced that we as a people are ready to give something back to our country in return for all it has given to us.

Let this be our commitment: Whatever sacrifices must be made will be shared and shared fairly. And let this be our confidence: At the end of our journey and always before us shines that ideal of liberty and justice for all.

In closing, let me say a few words to all those that I have met and to all those who have supported me, at this convention and across the country. There were hard hours on our journey, and often we sailed against the wind. But always we kept our rudder true, and there were so many of you who stayed the course and shared our hope. You gave your help, but even more, you gave your hearts.

Because of you, this has been a happy campaign. You welcomed Joan, me and our family into your homes and neighborhoods, your churches, your campuses, your union halls. When I think back of all the miles and all the months and all the memories, I think of you. I recall the poet's words, and I say: What golden friends I have.

Among you, my golden friends across this land, I have listened and learned.

I have listened to Kenny Dubois, a glassblower in Charleston, West Virginia, who has ten children to support but has lost his job after 35 years, just three years short of qualifying for his pension.

I have listened to the Trachta family who farm in Iowa and who wonder whether they can pass the good life and the good earth on to their children.

I have listened to the grandmother in East Oakland who no longer has a phone to call her grandchildren because she gave it up to pay the rent on her small apartment.

I have listened to young workers out of work, to students without the tuition for college, and to families without the chance to own a home. I have seen the closed factories and the stalled assembly lines of Anderson, Indiana and South Gate, California, and I have seen too many, far too many idle men and women desperate to work. I have seen too many, far too many working families desperate to protect the value of their wages from the ravages of inflation.

Yet I have also sensed a yearning for new hope among the people in every state where I have been. And I have felt it in their handshakes, I saw it in their faces, and I shall never forget the mothers who carried children to our rallies. I shall always remember the elderly who have lived in an America of high purpose and who believe that it can all happen again.

Tonight, in their name, I have come here to speak for them. And for their sake, I ask you to stand with them. On their behalf I ask you to restate and reaffirm the timeless truth of our party.

I congratulate President Carter on his victory here.

I am confident that the Democratic Party will reunite on the basis of Democratic principles, and that together we will march towards a Democratic victory in 1980.

And someday, long after this convention, long after the signs come down, and the crowds stop cheering, and the bands stop playing, may it be said of our campaign that we kept the faith. May it be said of our Party in 1980 that we found our faith again.

And may it be said of us, both in dark passages and in bright days, in the words of Tennyson that my brothers quoted and loved, and that have special meaning for me now:
"I am a part of all that I have met....
Tho much is taken, much abides....
That which we are, we are--
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
...strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield."

For me, a few hours ago, this campaign came to an end. For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.

Senator Edward M. Kennedy - August 12, 1980

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

So You Think America's Dancing with Glee?

For a few years now I have been trying to understand the appeal of shows like "Dancing with the Stars" and "American Idol." I just don’t see the point. I will however admit to occasionally glancing at "Idol" during the first few episodes of the season... but they're always on DVR and I always fast forward through the singing part. I just want to watch Paula slam Simon. So much for that guilty pleasure... THANKS A LOT ELLEN! But, I digress.

Being a television producer I completely understand the purpose of shows like “Idol” and “So You Think You Can Dance.” They cost next to nothing to produce, rake in beaucoup (that's French for boat-load) bucks, and enchant millions of set of eyeballs to shoot out of their respective heads and fly into the plasma screen like bugs on a windshield. Classy, huh?

I have been doing some VERY informal polling (friends and family) and I can't seem to find any consistent reason why people are enthralled with these shows. So I had to look at the ratings. Here are some interesting tidbits (this is for the United States only):

  • The Finale of "M*A*S*H*" is still the big winner (50MM/70 share). I have no idea why. For me it was all about Henry Blake... "More wine my dear? But of course I know why, it's because of that 70 share. There was very little cable television and "M*A*S*H*" was king... fine. But of course, that was then (20th Century), and this is now (well... you know).

  • If you really dig into the numbers (and I won't bore you with all of them) what you find is that since 2000 only 1, Uno, Un, that's right, ONE scripted prime time telecast has been in the top 20 (and it's #12) and that was the "Friend's" finale (52.5MM/43 share).
Anyone care to take a guess at the top ten telecasts since 2000? Yah... all Super Bowls. But there is some trickery here. Those are just broadcasts. So where am I going with all of this?

It hasn't been since 2003 that we've seen a scripted prime time drama hold the top spot, and that was "C.S.I." Now don't get me wrong I love my William Peterson too, but the show isn't exactly "All in the Family." Since 2004? "American Idol" has been the top dawg (shout out to Randy). Part of me is really bummed out about this fact. How come more people aren't watching "Dexter" or "Mad Men" or "30 Rock" -- these are great shows with high production values and fantastic performances. My first instinct is to run right to the fact that we, as a country, have somehow "dummied" ourselves down. But then I look at my Mom and she's got 2 Master's degrees (one of them from Harvard) and she can't get enough of "Dancing with the Stars."

So then I think back to being a kid and you know what? We've always been obsessed with these types of shows. Can anyone say "Battle of the Network Stars?" Mr. Peabody, set the way back machine to February 1977:
  • ABC team: Gabe Kaplan (captain), LeVar Burton, Darleen Carr, Richard Hatch, Lawrence Hilton-Jacobs, Ron Howard, Hal Linden, Kristy McNichol, Penny Marshall, Jaclyn Smith

  • CBS team: Telly Savalas (captain), Sonny Bono, Kevin Dobson, Mike Farrell, David Groh, Linda Lavin, Lee Meriwether, Rob Reiner, Loretta Swit, Marcia Wallace

  • NBC team: Robert Conrad (captain), Elizabeth Allen, Lynda Day George, Carl Franklin, Karen Grassle, Dan Haggerty, Art Hindle, Kurt Russell, Jane Seymour, W. K. Stratton
Oh but to see Jane Seymour and Gabe Kaplan battle it out on "Simon Says." So maybe this is nothing new. Maybe I'm just being an old fuddy-duddy but I just wish more of us would watch the real challenging programming that is being offered to us. "NOVA" anyone?

I have no idea. I am lost. Oh hey... speaking of "Lost", can anyone PLEASE DEAR GOD tell me what that show is about?

More to come...

M

Friday, August 28, 2009

Back to School

Continuing with my "love for Autumn" theme, I have to say I am so excited to get back to school.

After high school I decided not to go the traditional route (college) and instead did my own thing (work). For years I kicked myself in the butt for not going straight to college. Seeing my peers advance quickly in their corporate jobs sometimes made me question whether or not I had made the right choice.

I am happy to report that yes, indeed, I made the right choice. My life and my work has been a great ride... and the killer part is that I get to do more of it and still on my terms. Oh that streak of independence will get me every-time.

So now I am there... ready to go back to school (I have done a fair amount of college work over the years) but I still have a ways to go. And that's fine.

I have to ask myself though... Do I want to go back to school to continue my education or because, like many people I know, I could spend days and days buying office and school supplies?

Right? C'mon... we all remember our SAT "analogy questions."

Children are to Toys-R-Us as Adults are to ________?

More to come...

M

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Hazy Shade of Autumn...

I woke up in the best mood today. I had no idea why. I just sprung into action. It was amazing. I made my breakfast shake (with a hefty side of coffee) and then went out back to enjoy another hot summer day... AND IT WAS FREEZING! I loved it. Did my body somehow know it was going to be like Fall out this morning?

So now I can't seem to get "Hazy Shade of Winter" out of my head. C'mon... sing it with me...
But look around, leaves are brown now And the sky is a hazy shade of winter Look around, leaves are brown There's a patch of snow on the ground.
Ok... so now that's over with... I am looking around and I can't wait for the leaves to turn brown. I love the winter. For a person that lived in sunny southern California for so many years, I guess I just forgot how much I love the fall and winter.

There's something about wearing sweaters and picking apples that just makes me so happy. Then we all get to spend months inside sitting by fires (hopefully in a fireplace, I am not advocating you start a bonfire in your dining room).

This morning was an amazing reminder to me of the joys of Fall.

Go away Summer... well not for good... just for a few months.

More to come...

M

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

YouTube to share ad money with more video makers

This is very cool! All you youtubers get out there and make some dough.

Though...one of these days a résumé is going to come across my desk with "youtube video poster" as a job title... hmmm.
__________________________________________________

NEW YORK (Reuters) - YouTube, the world's most popular video sharing site, said on Tuesday it will start sharing advertising cash with users who upload the most popular clips of everything from skateboarding dogs to dancing babies.

The video site, which is owned by Web search giant Google Inc, said it will extend its YouTube partnership program to allow individuals to make money when their videos are deemed eligible based on the number of views and how widely they are shared with other users.

YouTube has been criticized by some Google investors, who complain that the site has failed to capitalize financially on its immense popularity.

Until now, users who regularly produced videos could earn revenue from YouTube if they formally applied to be members of the partnership program, which YouTube said has earned some video producers "thousands of dollars."

Under the new system, if a video becomes popular YouTube will email the maker an "enable revenue sharing" message. Executives declined to quantify how popular a video would need to be for its owner receive the email. YouTube said it will sell ads against the clip only if the user agrees to do so.

One recent example of a clip that became a global phenomenon was the JK wedding dance video, which showed a Minnesota couple's wedding party performing an entrance dance routine. It was seen more than 10 million times in less than a week and picked up by various TV news outlets. But according to YouTube executives, the makers never made any money from the clip.

The extension of the program, to be available only in the United States initially, is the latest step by YouTube to improve its ability to make money from the thousands of videos that are uploaded to the site every day.

"We think there's tens of thousands more partners that we can generate through this content," said Tom Pickett, director online sales at YouTube.

Goldman Sachs estimates that YouTube will post revenue this year of about $300 million, and that the figure will increase by at least 40 percent in 2010. Analysts at Credit Suisse, however, have estimated that YouTube could lose nearly $500 million this year.

As part of its drive to increase revenue, YouTube has sought to increase the number of videos from traditional television and movie companies, encouraging more big-brand marketers to buy more advertising time. Earlier this month it signed a deal with Time Warner Inc for clips of shows from CNN, TNT, Cartoon Network and Warner Bros.

__________________________________________________

So much more to come...

Mark

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Etymologically speaking... etymologically.

I am fascinated by the origins of words. Yes, I am a geek and yes I am ok with that. What I am not ok with is the fact that other people don't seem to care about it as much as I do. I understand that meanings of words change from generation to generation, but where the word comes from stays the same.

The other day I read a commentary in Ode magazine. Below is an excerpt of In the beginning was the joke by John Lloyd:
There’s a mysterious passage in the Bible, that goes like this: "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God." This passage has the unmistakable ring of truth, which is curious, because it also appears to be meaningless gibberish. At first sight, that is. The word "Word" in this context is translated from the Greek logos, which means "word," of course, but in the particular sense of "that which expresses the inner thought." So we can retranslate the sentence as, "In the beginning was the Thought and the Thought was with God and the Thought was God." Now this is getting interesting, because in all the great Eastern religions, consciousness is considered the ground of being, preceding the clumsy and annoying business of matter.

Logos can be understood, more generally, to mean "speech" or "conversation." So another translation is, "In the beginning was Speech…" This is consistent with Genesis, wherein the first thing that happens is God says "Let there be light." In this reading, speech is more ancient than the laws of physics, which, again, may not be very scientific (at least not yet) but is quite interesting.

Now when logos passes into Latin, it takes on yet another meaning, one that, for all I know, preserves a long-lost original Greek usage that didn’t make it into Liddell & Scott’s dictionary. And that meaning is "joke": "In the beginning was the Joke and the Joke was with God and the Joke was God." And you know, ever since I found that translation I’ve been a lot more cheerful.
I too have been a lot more cheerful since I found that translation. So that got-me-a-thinkin' ... How can I share this passion for word origin with the world? So what I think I am going to do is just randomly pick words from my posts and tack on an asterisk* to any word that I think has a cool origin and then at the end of the post I will just list the them. I wonder* what we'll learn from this?

More to come...

M
-------------------------------
asterisk: 1382, from L.L. asteriscus, from Gk. asterikos "little star," dim. of aster "star." The meaning "figure used in printing and writing to indicate footnote, omission, etc." first recorded 1612.
wonder: O.E. wundor "marvelous thing, marvel, the object of astonishment," from P.Gmc. *wundran (cf. O.S. wundar, M.Du., Du. wonder, O.H.G. wuntar, Ger. wunder, O.N. undr), of unknown origin. In M.E. it also came to mean the emotion associated with such a sight (c.1290). The verb is from O.E. wundrian. Used colloquially in Pennsylvania Ger. areas in some transitive senses (It wonders me that ... for "I wonder why ..."); this was common in M.E. and as late as Tindale (1533), also survives in Yorkshire/Lincolnshire. Wonderful is recorded from c.1100. Wonderland "imaginary realm" is from 1790; wonder-worker (1599) translates Gk. thaumatourgos.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Elmo and Stitch...

I have a lot to owe to the world. All things being equal (which they never are), life is pretty good.

I woke up early again today (this time because I left my AC on overnight set to 62..brrrr) so I flipped on the TV and saw that Eunice Kennedy Shriver died last night. It really bummed me out. Not because I knew her or anything... I just think she was a perfect example of the kind of people that seem to be leaving us at an alarming clip. Here was a woman with everything... money... fame... the last name Kennedy... She could have sat back all day and ate bon-bons and lived her happy wealthy life. Instead, she went out and founded the Special Olympics. Score one for Eunice.

So this has me asking, what am I doing for other people? How am I going to make today a little better for someone? I wasn't given many gifts, but one that I've been told is that I make people laugh sometimes... How Freudian is that?

So in honor of Eunice and Sigmund (now there's a pair), I think there needs to be a show called "Elmo and Stitch"... you know... Like a classic buddy film? Stitch would always be causing mischief while Elmo would be trying to keep things all straight laced... but I think Stitch would get bored with that... and seeing that he's prone to bad behavior... well...

Is it just me, or does Stitch look like he's about to eat Elmo?

Thanks Eunice...

More to come...

M